Skip to content
AutoSpec Index
Menu

1985 Ford Tempo

US · Compact Cars

The 1985 Ford Tempo is listed in the US market. Every figure below carries the source it came from, and anything our sources do not publish is left out rather than estimated.

Engine
Varies by configuration: 2.0L 4-cylinder (CALIF), 2.3L 4-cylinder (FFS) CA model), 2.3L 4-cylinder (FFS)
Transmission
Varies by configuration: Manual, Automatic
Drivetrain
FWD
Fuel
Varies by configuration: Diesel, Gasoline
Economy
22 mpg (10.7 L/100 km) to 34 mpg (6.9 L/100 km) combined
Generic outline for this body type. An illustration, not a photograph.
Specifications at a Glance

Key Figures

Units:
Engine / Powertrain
2.0L 4-cylinder (CALIF), 2.3L 4-cylinder (FFS) CA model), 2.3L 4-cylinder (FFS)
Combined Economy
22 mpg (10.7 L/100 km) to 34 mpg (6.9 L/100 km) combined
Drivetrain
FWD
Transmission
Manual, Automatic
Market: US·Switch units to convert the figures shown.
Compare 1985 Ford Tempo ↗

Engine

Engine
SpecificationValueSource
EngineVaries by configuration: 2.0L 4-cylinder (CALIF), 2.3L 4-cylinder (FFS) CA model), 2.3L 4-cylinder (FFS)
Displacement2.0 L to 2.3 L
Cylinders4
Fuel typeVaries by configuration: Diesel, Gasoline

Transmission and drivetrain

Transmission and drivetrain
SpecificationValueSource
TransmissionVaries by configuration: Manual, Automatic
Gears3 to 5
DrivetrainFWD

Fuel economy and range

Fuel economy and range
SpecificationValueSource
Combined22 mpg (10.7 L/100 km) to 34 mpg (6.9 L/100 km)
City19 mpg (12.4 L/100 km) to 31 mpg (7.6 L/100 km)
Highway26 mpg (9.0 L/100 km) to 39 mpg (6.0 L/100 km)

Our sources do not publish these for this vehicle: Aspiration, Power, Torque, Electric range, Battery capacity. We leave them out instead of estimating.

Trims and configurations

7 configurations listed by our sources. Engines, drivetrains and fuel economy can differ between them.

Recalls

NHTSA lists 4 recall campaigns for this model year. Last checked November 9, 2026.

  • 07E064000: FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE:DELIVERY:FUEL PUMP

    CERTAIN FEDERAL-MOGUL AFTERMARKET FUEL PUMPS SOLD UNDER THE BRAND NAMES OF CARTER, ACCUFLOW, NAPA, TRUFLOW, PARTS DEPO, AND PARTS MASTER, SHIPPED BETWEEN AUGUST 2006 AND JULY 2007 FOR USE ON THE VEHICLES LISTED ABOVE. THE FUEL PUMP DIAPHRAGM IN CERTAIN PRODUCTION RUNS MAY HAVE BEEN IMPROPERLY INSTALLED OR INADEQUATELY TESTED WHICH MAY CAUSE THE FUEL PUMP TO LEAK.

    Remedy: FEDERAL-MOGUL WILL NOTIFY OWNERS AND REPLACE THE DEFECTIVE FUEL PUMPS FREE OF CHARGE. THE RECALL BEGAN ON OCTOBER 15, 2007. OWNERS CAN CONTACT FEDERAL-MOGUL AT 248-354-7700.

    Reported August 27, 2007. View on NHTSA

  • 85V145000: SUSPENSION:REAR

    REAR SUPENSION CONTROL ARM-TO-SPINDLE ATTACHMENT BOLTS MAY BE SUBJECT TO FRACTURE CAUSING THE REAR SPINDLE TO SEPARATE DURING USE OF CAR. CONSEQUENCE OF DEFECT: IF BOLTS FRACTURE AND REAR SPINDLE DISENGAGES FROM CONTROL ARM,…

    Remedy: REPLACE REAR SUSPENSION BOLTS AS NECESSARY.

    Reported November 5, 1985. View on NHTSA

  • 85V134000: ELECTRICAL SYSTEM:IGNITION:MODULE

    THE UNEXPECTED OPEN THROTTLE CAUSES AN INCREASE IN ENGINE SPEED WHICH COULD RESULT IN LOSS OF CONTROL OF THE CAR AND A POTENTIAL CRASH. CONSEQUENCE OF DEFECT: THE ELECTRONIC ENGINE CONTROL PROCESSOR MAY EXPERIENCE AN INTERMITTENT…

    Remedy: REPLACE ELECTRONIC ENGINE CONTROL PROCESSOR, IF NECESSARY.

    Reported October 22, 1985. View on NHTSA

  • 85V086000: SUSPENSION:REAR

    REAR SUSPENSION CONTROL ARM-TO-SPINDLE ATTACHMENT BOLTS MAY BE SUBJECT TO FRACTURE DURING USE OF CAR. CONSEQUENCE OF DEFECT: IF BOLTS FRACTURE, REAR SPINDLE COULD DISENGAGE FROM CONTROL ARM AND POSSIBLY RESULT IN LOSS OF CONTROL.

    Remedy: REPLACE REAR SUSPENSION BOLTS AS NECESSARY.

    Reported July 3, 1985. View on NHTSA

Data sources

  • EPA fueleconomy.gov · retrieved October 24, 2026 · US Government public data
  • NHTSA vPIC · retrieved October 24, 2026 · US Government public data

Source checked: October 24, 2026

Data verified: October 24, 2026

Specifications can vary by market, trim, configuration and production date. Confirm with the manufacturer before buying parts or making safety decisions. Report an error.

Related vehicles

  • 1986 Ford Tempo

    Varies by configuration: Diesel, Gasoline

    Varies by configuration: 2.0L 4-cylinder ((NO-CAT)), 2.3L 4-cylinder ((FFS)) · FWD
    34 mpg (6.9 L/100 km) to 23 mpg (10.2 L/100 km)

  • 1984 Ford Tempo

    Varies by configuration: Diesel, Gasoline

    Varies by configuration: 2.0L 4-cylinder ((CALIF)), 2.3L 4-cylinder ((CAL)(FFS)), 2.3L 4-cylinder ((FFS)), 2.0L 4-cylinder ((DIESEL) CA model), 2.3L 4-cylinder ((FFS) CA model)
    34 mpg (6.9 L/100 km) to 21 mpg (11.2 L/100 km)

Frequently asked questions

What engine does the 1985 Ford Tempo have?

Varies by configuration: 2.0L 4-cylinder ((CALIF)), 2.3L 4-cylinder ((FFS) CA model), 2.3L 4-cylinder ((FFS)). Engines can differ by trim, so check the trim list below.

What is the fuel economy of the 1985 Ford Tempo?

Combined fuel economy is 22 mpg (10.7 L/100 km) to 34 mpg (6.9 L/100 km), as published by the source shown in the specification table.

Is the 1985 Ford Tempo front-wheel, rear-wheel or all-wheel drive?

Drivetrain: FWD.

Are there recalls for the 1985 Ford Tempo?

NHTSA lists 4 recall campaigns for this model year (last checked November 9, 2026). Details are in the Recalls section.