1984 Ford Tempo
US · Compact Cars
The 1984 Ford Tempo is listed in the US market. Every figure below carries the source it came from, and anything our sources do not publish is left out rather than estimated.
- Engine
- Varies by configuration: 2.0L 4-cylinder (CALIF), 2.0L 4-cylinder (DIESEL) CA model), 2.3L 4-cylinder (FFS) CA model), 2.3L 4-cylinder (CAL)(FFS), 2.3L 4-cylinder (FFS)
- Transmission
- Varies by configuration: Manual, Automatic
- Fuel
- Varies by configuration: Diesel, Gasoline
- Economy
- 21 mpg (11.2 L/100 km) to 34 mpg (6.9 L/100 km) combined
Key Figures
Engine
| Specification | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Engine | Varies by configuration: 2.0L 4-cylinder (CALIF), 2.0L 4-cylinder (DIESEL) CA model), 2.3L 4-cylinder (FFS) CA model), 2.3L 4-cylinder (CAL)(FFS), 2.3L 4-cylinder (FFS) | |
| Displacement | 2.0 L to 2.3 L | |
| Cylinders | 4 | |
| Fuel type | Varies by configuration: Diesel, Gasoline | EPA fueleconomy.gov |
Transmission and drivetrain
| Specification | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Transmission | Varies by configuration: Manual, Automatic | |
| Gears | 3 to 5 |
Fuel economy and range
| Specification | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Combined | 21 mpg (11.2 L/100 km) to 34 mpg (6.9 L/100 km) | EPA fueleconomy.gov |
| City | 19 mpg (12.4 L/100 km) to 31 mpg (7.6 L/100 km) | |
| Highway | 24 mpg (9.8 L/100 km) to 39 mpg (6.0 L/100 km) |
Our sources do not publish these for this vehicle: Aspiration, Power, Torque, Drivetrain, Electric range, Battery capacity. We leave them out instead of estimating.
Trims and configurations
7 configurations listed by our sources. Engines, drivetrains and fuel economy can differ between them.
Recalls
NHTSA lists 7 recall campaigns for this model year. Last checked November 9, 2026.
07E064000: FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE:DELIVERY:FUEL PUMP
CERTAIN FEDERAL-MOGUL AFTERMARKET FUEL PUMPS SOLD UNDER THE BRAND NAMES OF CARTER, ACCUFLOW, NAPA, TRUFLOW, PARTS DEPO, AND PARTS MASTER, SHIPPED BETWEEN AUGUST 2006 AND JULY 2007 FOR USE ON THE VEHICLES LISTED ABOVE. THE FUEL PUMP DIAPHRAGM IN CERTAIN PRODUCTION RUNS MAY HAVE BEEN IMPROPERLY INSTALLED OR INADEQUATELY TESTED WHICH MAY CAUSE THE FUEL PUMP TO LEAK.
Remedy: FEDERAL-MOGUL WILL NOTIFY OWNERS AND REPLACE THE DEFECTIVE FUEL PUMPS FREE OF CHARGE. THE RECALL BEGAN ON OCTOBER 15, 2007. OWNERS CAN CONTACT FEDERAL-MOGUL AT 248-354-7700.
Reported August 27, 2007. View on NHTSA
86V082000: SEATS
THE FORWARD BOLT THAT PROVIDES PART OF THE ATTACHMENT BETWEEN THE DRIVER'S SEAT BACK ASSEMBLY AND THE SEAT CUSHION FRAME MAY BE SUBJECT TO FATIGUE FRACTURE. CONSEQUENCE OF DEFECT: IF THIS BOLT BREAKS, THE DRIVER AND SEAT BACK WILL FALL BACK, WHICH…
Remedy: REPLACE SCREWS THAT ATTACH DRIVER'S SEAT BACK ASSEMBLY TO THE SEAT CUSHION FRAME.
Reported June 24, 1986. View on NHTSA
85V145000: SUSPENSION:REAR
REAR SUPENSION CONTROL ARM-TO-SPINDLE ATTACHMENT BOLTS MAY BE SUBJECT TO FRACTURE CAUSING THE REAR SPINDLE TO SEPARATE DURING USE OF CAR. CONSEQUENCE OF DEFECT: IF BOLTS FRACTURE AND REAR SPINDLE DISENGAGES FROM CONTROL ARM,…
Remedy: REPLACE REAR SUSPENSION BOLTS AS NECESSARY.
Reported November 5, 1985. View on NHTSA
85V086000: SUSPENSION:REAR
REAR SUSPENSION CONTROL ARM-TO-SPINDLE ATTACHMENT BOLTS MAY BE SUBJECT TO FRACTURE DURING USE OF CAR. CONSEQUENCE OF DEFECT: IF BOLTS FRACTURE, REAR SPINDLE COULD DISENGAGE FROM CONTROL ARM AND POSSIBLY RESULT IN LOSS OF CONTROL.
Remedy: REPLACE REAR SUSPENSION BOLTS AS NECESSARY.
Reported July 3, 1985. View on NHTSA
84V071000: SEATS
SEAT FRAME STRUCTURE COULD SEVER FRONT SEAT BELTS IF VEHICLE IS INVOLVED IN AN ACCIDENT, DEPENDING ON FORCE OF IMPACT.
Remedy: DEALER WILL INSTALL A MOLDED SPACER BETWEEN REINFORCEMENT PLATES AND LOWER DECORATIVE PLASTIC COVER.
Reported June 15, 1984. View on NHTSA
83V134000: SEAT BELTS:FRONT:ANCHORAGE
THE BOLTS THAT ATTACH THE D-SHAPED RING FOR THE SHOULDER BELT ARE INADEQUATELY SUPPORTED BY THE MATERIAL IN WHICH THEY ARE MOUNTED. THE ATTACHMENT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD NO. 210, "SEAT BELT ASSEMBLY ANCHORAGES".
Remedy: DEALERS WILL INSTALL NEW ATTACHING HARDWARE TO IMPROVE THE STRENGTH OF THE MOUNTING.
Reported December 20, 1983. View on NHTSA
83V055000: INTERIOR LIGHTING
IN THE EVENT OF A SHORT CIRCUIT IN THE INSTRUMENT PANEL, THE HEADLAMP AND INTERIOR ILLUMINATION CONTROL SWITCHES COULD OVERHEAT.
Remedy: THE HEADLAMP SWITCH WILL BE REPLACED AND FUSE AND FUSE PANEL WILL BE INSPECTED FOR SAFE OPERATION.
Reported May 16, 1983. View on NHTSA
Data sources
- EPA fueleconomy.gov · retrieved October 25, 2026 · US Government public data
- NHTSA vPIC · retrieved October 25, 2026 · US Government public data
Source checked: October 25, 2026
Data verified: October 25, 2026
Specifications can vary by market, trim, configuration and production date. Confirm with the manufacturer before buying parts or making safety decisions. Report an error.
Related vehicles
- 1985 Ford Tempo
Varies by configuration: Gasoline, Diesel
Varies by configuration: 2.3L 4-cylinder ((FFS) CA model), 2.0L 4-cylinder ((CALIF)), 2.3L 4-cylinder ((FFS)) · FWD
34 mpg (6.9 L/100 km) to 22 mpg (10.7 L/100 km)
Explore similar vehicles
Frequently asked questions
What engine does the 1984 Ford Tempo have?
Varies by configuration: 2.0L 4-cylinder ((CALIF)), 2.0L 4-cylinder ((DIESEL) CA model), 2.3L 4-cylinder ((FFS) CA model), 2.3L 4-cylinder ((CAL)(FFS)), 2.3L 4-cylinder ((FFS)). Engines can differ by trim, so check the trim list below.
What is the fuel economy of the 1984 Ford Tempo?
Combined fuel economy is 21 mpg (11.2 L/100 km) to 34 mpg (6.9 L/100 km), as published by the source shown in the specification table.
Are there recalls for the 1984 Ford Tempo?
NHTSA lists 7 recall campaigns for this model year (last checked November 9, 2026). Details are in the Recalls section.