2012 Land Rover Range Rover vs 2012 Subaru Tribeca
Published figures side by side. Rows where our sources have no value for a vehicle read “Not available”. Configurations differ within a model year, so ranges are shown where they apply.
| Specification | 2012 Land Rover Range Rover | 2012 Subaru Tribeca |
|---|---|---|
| Engine | ||
| Engine | Varies by configuration: 5.0L 8-cylinder supercharged (SIDI), 5.0L 8-cylinder (SIDI), 2.0L 4-cylinder turbocharged (SIDI) | 3.6L 6-cylinder |
| Displacement | 2.0 L to 5.0 L | 3.6 L |
| Cylinders | 4 to 8 | 6 |
| Aspiration | Varies by configuration: Supercharged, Turbocharged | Not available |
| Fuel type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Transmission and drivetrain | ||
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Gears | 6 | 5 |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | AWD |
| Fuel economy and range | ||
| Combined | 22 mpg (10.7 L/100 km) to 14 mpg (16.8 L/100 km) | 18 mpg (13.1 L/100 km) |
| City | 18 mpg (13.1 L/100 km) to 12 mpg (19.6 L/100 km) | 16 mpg (14.7 L/100 km) |
| Highway | 27 mpg (8.7 L/100 km) to 17 mpg (13.8 L/100 km) | 21 mpg (11.2 L/100 km) |