1984 Ford F250 vs 1984 Ford Ranger
Published figures side by side. Rows where our sources have no value for a vehicle read “Not available”. Configurations differ within a model year, so ranges are shown where they apply.
| Specification | 1984 Ford F250 | 1984 Ford Ranger |
|---|---|---|
| Engine | ||
| Engine | Varies by configuration: 4.9L 6-cylinder ((FFS) CA model), 4.9L 6-cylinder ((FFS)), 5.0L 8-cylinder, 5.0L 8-cylinder ((FFS) CA model), 5.8L 8-cylinder ((FFS)), 5.8L 8-cylinder, 5.8L 8-cylinder ((FFS) CA model) | Varies by configuration: 2.0L 4-cylinder ((FFS)), 2.2L 4-cylinder ((DIESEL)), 2.3L 4-cylinder ((FFS)), 2.3L 4-cylinder ((FFS) CA model), 2.3L 4-cylinder, 2.8L 6-cylinder ((FFS) CA model), 2.8L 6-cylinder ((FFS)) |
| Displacement | 4.9 L to 5.8 L | 2.0 L to 2.8 L |
| Cylinders | 6 to 8 | 4 to 6 |
| Fuel type | Gasoline | Varies by configuration: Gasoline, Diesel |
| Transmission and drivetrain | ||
| Transmission | Varies by configuration: Automatic, Manual | Varies by configuration: Manual, Automatic |
| Gears | 3 to 4 | 3 to 5 |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD |
| Fuel economy and range | ||
| Combined | 15 mpg (15.7 L/100 km) to 10 mpg (23.5 L/100 km) | 26 mpg (9.0 L/100 km) to 14 mpg (16.8 L/100 km) |
| City | 14 mpg (16.8 L/100 km) to 10 mpg (23.5 L/100 km) | 25 mpg (9.4 L/100 km) to 13 mpg (18.1 L/100 km) |
| Highway | 17 mpg (13.8 L/100 km) to 10 mpg (23.5 L/100 km) | 28 mpg (8.4 L/100 km) to 15 mpg (15.7 L/100 km) |