2002 Chrysler PT Cruiser vs 2002 Land Rover Range Rover
Published figures side by side. Rows where our sources have no value for a vehicle read “Not available”. Configurations differ within a model year, so ranges are shown where they apply.
| Specification | 2002 Chrysler PT Cruiser | 2002 Land Rover Range Rover |
|---|---|---|
| Engine | ||
| Engine | 2.4L 4-cylinder | 4.6L 8-cylinder |
| Displacement | 2.4 L | 4.6 L |
| Cylinders | 4 | 8 |
| Fuel type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Transmission and drivetrain | ||
| Transmission | Varies by configuration: Automatic, Manual | Automatic |
| Gears | 4 to 5 | 4 |
| Drivetrain | FWD | AWD |
| Fuel economy and range | ||
| Combined | 22 mpg (10.7 L/100 km) to 20 mpg (11.8 L/100 km) | 12 mpg (19.6 L/100 km) |
| City | 19 mpg (12.4 L/100 km) to 17 mpg (13.8 L/100 km) | 11 mpg (21.4 L/100 km) |
| Highway | 27 mpg (8.7 L/100 km) to 23 mpg (10.2 L/100 km) | 14 mpg (16.8 L/100 km) |